Wind ‘farms’ not a success: letter to Hill Times

In this week’s edition of the Hill Times, following last week’s feature, the following letter to the Editor:

Ontario’s wind farms not a success

Published: Monday, 08/19/2013 12:00 am EDT
Last Updated: Monday, 08/19/2013 3:37 pm EDT

Bob Chiarelli is quoted in The Hill Times as saying “wind power produces no greenhouse gases and is part of a program of modernization of Ontario’s power system. It’s a tremendous success story” (“Critics call Ontario’s wind farms ‘a disaster’ in rural areas but Energy Minister Chiarelli says government is working with municipalities,” Renewable Energy Policy Briefing, Aug. 12),
   I beg to differ with that statement. Mr. Chiarelli is either uninformed or very disingenous and he is totally wrong. It takes several thousand tons of coal to produce one industrial wind turbine. How is that modernizing the system? Coal produces greenhouse gasses.
   Ontario has spent millions of dollars ($60-million in 2009) for the Bruce Power Plant not to produce power. We do not need nor can Ontario afford IWTs. It is all a financial disaster for Ontario.
IWTs were forced on us by the McGuinty/Wynne Liberals. They turned our rural area into an industrial zone.  
   As a result, we are “enjoying” our senior years surrounded by IWTs. We have tried to sell and move to a smaller property but no one is looking. The whole area is in turmoil as family members, neighbours and friends are about to start a class action law suit against the land owners and wind proponents. Many are suffering health problems related to IWTs and Mr. Chiarelli calls this a “success story?”
Frank and Helen Belbeck
Fisherville, Ont.

The Hill Times:critics call wind farms in rural areas a disaster

In this week’s edition of The Hill Times, is a profile of how wind power is being rolled out in Ontario.
    Wind Concerns Ontario president Jane Wilson is quoted as saying, wind power represents an almost insignificant portion of power supplied to the province, but the wind power installations themselves have a “huge impact on rural-small urban communities.”
    Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment Gideon Forman persists with the wind industry claim that there is no research showing direct effects to health from the noise and infrasound produced by the wind turbines: “there is annoyance for some people…but in terms of a direct causal effect between a wind turbine and health effects, we just haven’t seen it.”
   Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli is quoted by the Hill Times as saying wind power produces no greenhouse gases and is part of a program of modernization of Ontario’s power system. “It’s a tremendous success story.”
   The article is here.
   Letters to the Editor may be sent to news@hilltimes.com

New website on the “human face” of wind in Ontario

A new website has been launched called the Human Face of Wind, which documents the stories of people and communities that are now living with wind power generation projects in Ontario.
The website features real-life accounts of what the local wind power projects have done to families and communities.
The host has also travelled extensively in Ontario and taken pictures—these are a far cry from the media photos (supplied by the wind industry) of single turbines all alone in a field, far from homes or schools or other buildings.
Visit the site today at: http://www.humanfaceofwindturbines.ca/

turbines loom over small island

Turbines loom over Wolfe Island

Some councils putting health and safety concerns ahead of developer dollars

Several municipalities in Ontario are taking a stand against wind power development out of concern for their citizens, reports the Windsor Star, in spite of the fact they may be risking revenue and largesse from corporate wind developers.

Cash-strapped Amherstburg council declared the town an “unwilling host” for wind turbine projects and is potentially turning away big bucks from future developers in property tax revenue and payments turbine operators make to towns per unit.
Lakeshore gets $100,000 in property tax revenue from its 120 wind turbines and will receive $4 million over 20 years in annual payments made by the wind turbine companies per unit to the municipality, said Steve Salmons, Lakeshore’s director of community and development services.
“It’s been a financial windfall for us,” Salmons said. “We also have $1 million in road improvements and repairs (developers made) that wouldn’t have gotten to.”
Lakeshore council is “open for business” when it comes to wind turbines. Salmons estimated the turbines will have a $7 million economic impact on the town including lease payments made to land owners. Amherstburg Coun. Diane Pouget is unconvinced by the financial benefits. “We don’t know what the health issues are associated with (wind turbines). We have asked for no further wind turbines to come into our community until we receive all of the (health) information.”
While the town may be passing up sources of revenue, Pouget said health and safety are a paramount concern for council. She said it was her understanding that Ontario pays the U.S. to take its power when it has generated too much, partly because there is no way to store renewable energy The federal government is doing a study on the health effects of wind turbine noise and results are due next year.

It is approximately 70 weeks until the next municipal election in Ontario.

http://www.windsorstar.com/health/Taking+stand+wind+turbines/8740263/story.html