Energy Minister claims power bill increases “flatlined”

flatline

Something is moribund, Parker Gallant says, but it’s the Minister’s handling of this portfolio that isn’t too healthy.

 

OEB rate increases are flatlined?

The Windsor Star on June 23, 2015 interviewed Ontario Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli; some of the comments from the article were very interesting.

Chiarelli said consumers have seen the last of sharp increases that averaged about six per cent annually over the last eight years. Starting next year, hydro rates for industrial users are expected to rise by 1.7 per cent — about the rate of inflation. Increases in rates for residential users will be “slightly higher,” he added and went on to note:  “There was a blip in rate pressures because of the investments that we made, but starting in 2016 that will be flatlined very significantly.”

Here we are in 2016 and the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) just announced rate increases for the “electricity” line on our bills for the next six months commencing May 1, 2016.   Just prior to the announcement the OEB issued a release stating they had “redefined” what a “typical” residential customer uses and dropped it from 800 kWh per month to 750 kWh.  The effect of that “redefined” typical ratepayer reduces the monthly increase quoted in the press release.

Was intentional to support Energy Minister Chiarelli’s “flatlined” comment?

What the press release didn’t tell us was what “electricity” rates will actually increase.   As an example Off-peak rates will increase from 8.3 cents to 8.7 cents; a 4.8% increase for 6 months and a 9.6% increase annually.  Most households consume 67% of their electricity during the Off-peak hours so the rate increase for 67% of the “typical” bill increased by 9.6% not the 2.5% the press release pretended!  For Mid-peak the rate increase was 3.1% for the 6 months and for On-peak the increase of 0.5 cents was 2.9% for six months.

So, in Energy Minister Chiarelli’s math—the “blip” he referenced, and his apparent misunderstanding of the English language term “flatlined” has a connotation bordering on death as Merriam Webster defines it:  “to register on an electronic monitor as having no brain waves or heartbeat”.

There is a lot unsaid in the “flatlined” definition that ratepayers will no doubt consider as applicable to the mismanagement of the Energy portfolio, and the constant and incessant increases in their electricity bills every six months.

Minister Chiarelli recently announced he is seeking another 600 megawatts of industrial wind turbines that will no doubt continue the “flatlined” rate increases and add to the killing, harming and harassment of birds and bats and also result in more rural residents suffering from health effects caused by those industrial wind turbines.

Time for the Minister to stop the madness.

© Parker Gallant,

April 14, 2016

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent Wind Concerns Ontario policy.

Comments

Pat Cusack
Reply

You’re right Mr. Gallant! High time.

Andre Lauzon
Reply

I wonder if Chiarelli’s family is ashamed of him. They should be.

Little ol' me
Reply

They should be ashamed but I expect not; no biting off the hand that feeds you…
I would expect family ethics are at par with Chia.

FNangry
Reply

Doubleplusgood news today!! starting may 1st the on peak rate has DECREASED from 18.5 cents/kWh to 18.0cents/kWh!

Wynee and Bob need to be unpersoned.

From the release: “The ratio between on and off-peak prices is more than 2:1 meaning that the off-peak price is
less than half the cost of the on-peak. This means customers who shift use to evenings and
weekends will see a reward for doing so. ”

How is not getting screwed quite as badly a “reward”????? F right off.

And of course these are before delivery and fees. But you saved 1.20 from not paying debt retirement charge!

Just wait till they get their grubby little hands on your gas bills and pension plan!!!!

Grant Church
Reply

An annual increase of 9.6% is exactly what I calculated on my power bill. And for what? To pay out of sync wind turbines to sit idle, along with gas plants. Oh ya, to pay to spill water at hydro dams and steam off at Bruce Power. And of course, to dump power in Quebec, New York, and Michigan, costing us $1.8 billion last year. Just brilliant Mr. Chiarelli. Come out and debate like a gentleman. We’re waiting.

Tony
Reply

as Bugs would say if he ever met Chiarelli, ‘what a maroon’

John Foreman
Reply

To be told, by the news media, that the reason for the increase is that we were too good at conserving only adds insult to injury! We’re told to conserve power and then the next thing….. our rates go UP because we did!! If the provincial liberal government is gonna give away, or sell at a loss, our electricity surplus, they should consider not charging Ontario residents AT ALL for electricity used during off-peak and maybe even mid-peak hours. Give your own people a “break” for a change!!

Pat Cusack
Reply

They absolutely SUCK!

Leave a comment

name*

email* (not published)

website