Missing electricity data shows Wynne government not ‘transparent’

Premier Wynne: promise of "open" government means you have to look for the truth...it's hiding
Premier Wynne: promise of “open” government means you have to look for the truth…it’s hiding

Omitted data means Ontario government and IESO, not transparent 

A Government of Ontario website, updated January 11, 2016, is all about the promise of  “Open Government”.  Premier Kathleen Wynne is quoted: “Our Open Government initiative will help create the transparent, accessible government the people of Ontario deserve. This is part of our vision for One Ontario, where every voice counts.”

That looks like an empty promise in respect to the Energy Ministry anyway: the IESO (Independent Electricity System Operator) just released its “2015 Ontario Electricity Data” and it’s full of missing data. Perhaps that would have been considered too open and too transparent.

What IESO didn’t tell us:

  •  Exporting 22,618,000 megawatts (MWh) of surplus power in 2015 cost Ontario ratepayers $1.759 billion.
  • Those 22,618,000 MWh would have powered about 50% (2.4 million) average Ontario households that consume 800 kWh monthly and 9.6 MWh annually.
  • Those 22,618,000 MWh represented 16.5% of total Ontario Demand in 2015 and 14.8% of total Ontario generation from all sources (except imbedded).
  • Embedded (referred to as Dx) capacity in Ontario at the end of the third quarter of 2015 totaled 3,579.2 MW of capacity and included 2,103 MW of solar and 669 MW of wind; the amount of energy those two sources alone probably generated (estimated as IESO don’t provide this data) was in the order of 4,500,000 MWh.
  • Estimated cost of Dx solar, $1.4 billion and of Dx wind $220 million additional to the reported wind production cost of $1,125 million and the $125 million cost of reported solar bringing total costs of those two sources to almost $2.9 billion. That’s without factoring in other related costs!
  • Wind and solar generation are given “first to the grid” rights meaning they often create SBG (surplus baseload generation) which requires Bruce Power to “steam off” nuclear production for which they are paid, but that potential generation and its cost to ratepayers was not reported by IESO. In fact, there were 588 incidences in 2014 when nuclear was “steamed off,” but IESO don’t report the incidences for 2015.
  • IESO don’t disclose how much wind or solar was curtailed or constrained, so we are unable to determine how much additional surplus generation may have been produced without grid constraints, and what that may have cost ratepayers.
  • The spilling of clean hydro is also part of the maneuvers to prevent SBG often caused by power generation from wind, produced out-of-phase with demand, but IESO don’t disclose either the generation spilled, or the cost to ratepayers for that lost carbon-free power production.
  • IESO claim Ontario Demand fell by 2% in 2015 thanks to “conservation,” etc., but the reader isn’t told the cost of the conservation program, nor is it explained what IESO meant by “broader economic shifts.” Does this mean Ontario is losing (more) manufacturing jobs, or households and businesses are simply going off-grid?
  • IESO doesn’t disclose costs of generation by source so the reader is completely uninformed; for example, what did the 15.4 terawatts (TWh) of gas generation cost us in 2015? Would it be asking too much for IESO to, at the very least, disclose in their press release what the capacity of each generation source was at the year-end right above where they disclose its production?
  • IESO casually include the Global Adjustment as a per kilowatt hour cost but don’t disclose that average households pick up a large part ($500/600 million annually) of the total costs to allow Class A (large industrial customers) lower rates.
  • IESO fail to note the cost of a kilowatt of electricity (exclusive of distribution, etc. costs) increased from an average of 9.06 cents/kWh to 10.8 cents/kWh, an 11.9% increase from 2014 to 2015.

 

 

 

 

And last,

  • IESO don’t disclose the total value of the GA except to note it was 7.78 cents/kWh. If one extrapolates the per/kWh GA, against total generation (total Ontario consumption of 137 TWh plus net import/exports of 16.885 TWh plus Dx of 4.5 TWh = 158.355 TWh), the Global Adjustment becomes $12.3 billion!

With this amount of important data missing, should we consider IESO to be open and transparent?

Surely the current provincial government can’t seriously believe Ontario’s ratepayers are so simple minded as to be satisfied by empty promises of an “open” and “transparent” government when they view the incomplete utterances from an entity directly under the purview and control of the Minister of Energy, Bob Chiarelli.

It’s time for the current Premier to stop pretending “every voice counts”!

© Parker Gallant,

January 18, 2016

The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent Wind Concerns Ontario policy.

 

 

Comments

Lynn Kitchen
Reply

What I would like to know is who can we elect to begin to fix our mismanaged hydro system?
Any ideas?

Pat Cusack
Reply

I’ve no idea, Lynn. Maybe someone else does. Time to invoke the KISS theory.

Pat Cusack
Reply

Finding someone competent to run our Hydro System would be fairly simple. More than one change would be required and considerable money could be saved. More difficult would be finding someone who could take on the job subject to the constant interference and manipulations of Math challenged Mr Chiarilli and Mz Wynnne.
One wonders what percentage of the reduced consumption comes from conservation vs companies shutting down or relocating because of the exorbitant hydro costs. Bernie Cusack

Theresa
Reply

Why is this being allowed to continue? Our Premiere Wynne should be arrested immediately and put in jail. All renewable energy projects need to be stopped now. We need disclosure; we have a right to transparency and until our government can prove they are on the up and up, Wynne and associates should be held in jail. The facts have been disclosed. There is evidence. Expectations of the performance of people in positions as Wynne, are to be stellar; penalties for this coverup, “fleecing”, must reflect the seriousness of the crime committed.
I’ve had enough of the Liberal bullshit.
The latest Liberal term invented, Kathleen’s reference to “a stretched goal” refers to a promise that is made and is not fulfilled by the government because they never really planned to in the first place. Putting it simply, is an outright lie by the Liberals to get what they want (promising to reduce auto insurance by 15% by last August, to gain the support of tge NDP.)
This is another example of manipulation and playing on words in an attempt to cover their asses. It makes me sick.
If I was hired to a job and was not doing it, I would he fired and no longer paid. Politicians hold a very high position of authority and responsibility to the constituents. OUST the Liberals NOW. Every department in the big pink house at Queens Park needs to be investigated. Lock up the building, seize every computer; orders given to those involved not to leave the province.
It wouldn’t surprise me if some of the bandits have already had a complete change of idenity and have taken their fortunes and started a new life elsewhere. DNA samples from each politician should be on record. This is crime at it’s worse.

Theresa
Reply

Mike, you have that right! I am still laughing at your comment re “bovine”
Thanks for the chuckle!

Mike Jankowski
Reply

Always happy to take one for the team!

Next on the scale of not caring or acting is;
– Gallus Gallus Domesticus
– Code Blue

I hope we don’t descend any further. Some smart people have deployed XBoxes and Playstations to keep my generation too busy to worry about issues which impact their fellow person and perhaps their loved ones and even them.

Leave a comment

name*

email* (not published)

website