Report calls for end to wind power expansion

Tuesday Jul 4, 2017

By John Miner

The writer farms in Huron County

Ontario’s plan to double its wind energy capacity will make a bad situation worse, according to a report published by the Council for Clean and Reliable Energy.

There is already so much intermittent wind [power] generation in the Great Lakes Region that demand is over-supplied, prices are collapsing and generation must be curtailed, said the report released in June by the council, a non-profit organization formed by volunteers from universities, public sector business leaders, and labour.

The report’s author Marc Brouillette, a principal consultant at Strategic Policy Economics, calls on the province to reconsider its commitment to ongoing deployment of wind resources.

“Analysis shows that wind intermittency makes it an unproductive and expensive choice that doesn’t meet customers’ needs and also undermines the price of electricity exports,” says the report titled Ontario’s High-Cost Millstone.

The opportunity to pull back from the plan to expend wind energy comes this summer when Ontario updates its long-term energy plan.

A key part of the problem with wind energy, according to the report, is that it is misaligned with demand because of its intermittent nature.

Ontario’s energy use is highest in the winter and summer and lowest in spring and late fall.

“This is almost a mirror image of wind production patterns: wind is highest in the spring and fall, when electricity needs are lowest, and lowest in summer when electricity demand peaks,” the report notes.

The result is that two-thirds of wind [power] generation is surplus to demand and must be wasted or dissipated either through forced curtailment of hydro and nuclear generation, or by increased exports to Quebec and the United States, generally at low prices.

… Jane Wilson, president of Wind Concerns Ontario, a coalition of citizens’ groups critical of Ontario’s wind energy program, said the report underscores what two Auditors General told the McGuinty and Wynne governments — they should not have launched the program without any cost-benefit analysis.

“Now, Ontarians are paying four times as much for wind power which is very invasive and has had a huge impact on rural communities for very little benefit. The need for more fossil fuel natural gas to back it up means it is not even achieving the simple environmental goals.

“For people living with the noise and vibration of the huge turbines interfering with their lives, this is outrageous,” Wilson said.

No new wind power approvals should be granted, and development of projects not yet in operation should be halted, she said.

Brandy Gianetta, Ontario regional director for the Canadian Wind Energy Association, said the report fails to fully recognize that wind energy is making a significant contribution to Ontario’s electricity supply needs today and this contribution will only grow in future years.

CanWEA contends that Ontario should be securing the lowest [cost] non-greenhouse gas emitting electricity to fill the gap and ensure it can meet its climate goals.

“Wind energy, which is now the least-cost option for new electricity generation available in Ontario, is the best available resource to meet both of those needs, Gianetta said in an email.


FACT CHECK: wind power contributes about 6% of Ontario’s electricity supply, at four times the cost of other power sources; wind power is not the “lowest-cost” option—the turbines are cheap to build but there are many other costs associated with wind power and its intermittency; wind power cannot replace hydro and nuclear—the fact is, coal was replaced by nuclear and natural gas, a fossil-fuel-based power source. Ms Gianetta did not trot out the usual wind industry myth of massive job creation in Ontario because that has proven not to be true, here as in other jurisdictions. Jobs are short-term and related to construction activity, in the main. Other costs associated with wind power such as property value loss, effects on tourism, and human costs in terms of effects on health, have never been calculated.



The longer CANWEA, the MOECC and the wind companies refuse to protect people who are being harmed, the more costly the legal challenges will be for them.
People being harmed need to save all evidence of their pleas for protection.
Also people need to save all evidence of the loss of property values or added expenses incurred due to this ridiculously unfair imposition and harm.


Everyone needs to see this raw footage regarding climate change data that has deceived so many:


Some history

United Nations
Framework Convention On Climate Change
Conference Of The Parties, Geneva, 8 July 19 July, 1996, Sixty pages.

Annex I, begins on p. 28
(Agenda item 3 (a) )

Summaries of Opening Statements

P.30, No. 6

Elizabeth Dowdeswell

Much more at:


UN/United Nations Press Release, Dec.1, 1997


Re: Elizabeth Dowdeswell & Insurance Industry

‘Insurance Executives To Discuss Impact Of Climate Change At International Conference In Tokyo, 2 December’

“UNEP’s alliance with the insurance industry was launched two years ago when the first insurance companies signed on the UNEP Statement of Environmental Commitment by the insurance industry.”

Read more at:


ICTSD/International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development

News archive, 1997

Nov.1, 1997
UNEP Insurance Initiatives for the Environment

“More than 70 insurance companies from 25 counties have come together under the United Nations Environment Programme to constitute the UNEP Insurance Industry Initiative for the Environment.”

Scroll down to:

Nov. 12-14, 1997, Toronto

‘Policy Forum on Greenhouse Gas Initiatives’

‘”Forum 12-14 November, UNCTAD and the Earth Council hosted the second session of the Policy Forum on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in Toronto.”

Note: The First Policy Forum was held earlier in Chicago in 1997.

More at:

Events held prior to Kyoto, December 1997.


GEN/Geneva Environment Network, Geneva, Switzerland

A network coordinated by UNEP

Earth Council, Geneva

“The Earth Council is a non-governmental, non-profit organization founded in 1992 on the initiative of Maurice Strong to support and empower people in building a more secure, equitable and sustainable future.”

Earth Council Geneva spearheads the e-Learning Centre for Sustainable Development.

More at:


United Nations Framework Conference on Climate Change, Geneva, July 8-19, 1996

P.43, Re: Timothy Wirth, USA, Under-Secretary of State for Global Affairs.

Tim Wirth was a U.S. Senator from Colorado 1987-1993 and President of The United Nations Foundation (USA) 1998-2013.

Also: Wikipedia, Tim/Timothy Wirth.


UN/United Nations

Archived press release: 20 October 2003


“UNEP Launches New Initiative to Shift Investment to Sustainable Energy”

Includes quote attributed to Tim Wirth.

Read at:


UN / United Nations

Archived press release: 27 April 2006

Secretary-General Launches ‘Principles For Responsible Investment’ – Backed By World’s Largest Investors

Re: UNEP FI and pension funds.

Note: Toronto meeting c.2005/2006

More at:



‘Evaluation of the UNEP Finance Initiative (UNEP FI)’, June 2016, 91 pages

P.24: Key UNEP FI Milestones From 1991/92 – 2015

Sept. 2015, New Report, “Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century’

“Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century” is the UNEP “Roadmaps” project which includes:

Canada, launched Jan. 2017
U.S., launched Oct. 2016

Slow download, list at:



Changing Finance, Financing Change

‘Connecting Financial Systems And Sustainable Development: Market Leadership Paper / Advance Copy’, 2016, 23 pages.

Leadership Innovations

P.6, Sustainable Banking Leadership:

“Banks are the primary source of funding for renewable energy investment, and are critical sources of capital for infrastructure and SMEs.”

P.7, Green bonds – A Major New Asset Class

P.8, Sustainable Insurance Leadership

Pp, 18-20, End Notes: References

More at:


Here’s a video that explains how all of the above has been orchestrated:
The documents you’ve listed, expose the signatories and major players.



‘Fiduciary Duty In The 21st Century – Canada Roadmap’, 16 pages

P.3 Acknowledgements > Participants

Download report at:


The three UNEP FI / UNPRI Reports beginning with the Freshfiels Report (2005), the (2009) follow-up Report and the Roadmaps (2015) Project are known worldwide.

Should be no secret in Canada.


UNPRI – Canada

Re: Canadian groups

Includes: Toronto RI Working Group Steering Committee

Click on: Canada Signatories



a.k.a.: Freshfields Report

‘A legal framework for the integration of environmental, social and governance issues into institutional investment’, October 2005, 154 pages.

P.5, Acknowledgments: Canadian Project members.

P.49, Canada

Institutional investments included:

Pension funds
Life insurance companies
Mutual Funds




Fiduciary responsibility

“Legal and practical aspects of integrating environment, social and governance issues into institutional investment’, July 2009, 88 pages

“A follow up to the AMWG’s 2005 Freshfields Report.”

UNPRI is included in this Report


Benefits And Pensions Monitor, April 21, 2017


‘Fiduciary Duty: ESG Disclosure 101’

Re: Ontario

ESG and SRI investments practice
‘Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century, Canada Roadmap’, 2017

Note the references at the end of this article.

Read at:


Institutional Investor, October 12, 2015


‘Investors Seek Consensus on ESG as a Fiduciary Duty’


Pension funds
‘Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century

“Fiduciary-duty in the 21st Century is a follow-up to a 2005 report commissioned by the U.N. by the London-based international law firm Fairfields Bruckaus Deringer.”



Regarding the pension funds information you’ve listed Barbara, there is a statement that is very significant right now in one of those documents:
“Plan administrators face corporate and personal liability for breach of fiduciary duty if they fail to adequately protect or invest the assets of a registered pension plan. ”
With the ‘writing on the wall’ for the industrial scale wind industry, and with leading edge financial advisors using terms like ‘stranded assets/debt’, these plan administrators would be wise to wake up sooner than later.



Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition

“Mobilizing Financial Markets To Drive Economic Decarbonization”

Members include:

Toronto Atmospheric Fund
And others



Impact Investing

“TAF is the only Canadian client of one of the leading global climate investment firms – Generation Investment Management – and a key client for a local green investment firm.”



PRI/Principles for Responsible Investing

‘Report On Progress: Private Equity’, 2014

List of Private Equity Respondents To The PRI Reporting Framework 2014-5


Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, 2006
Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, 2011

JCM Capital (Provisional Signatory), 2014

Download the Report at:


‘I hope Canadians take away two things today: Our rights are not subject to the whims of the government of the day, and there are serious costs when the government violates the rights of its citizens’- Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould


Richard Mann

Has anyone heard back from the Huron County Health Unit?

The investigation was initiated in March 2016. (Ontario’s HPPA, Health Protection and Prevention Act). Since then we have had one delay after another, and still no remedy for those living under turbines.

As of July 4th, 2017, Erica Clark informed me they have heard back University of Waterloo ethics and are now planning another ethics applications to address concerns raised.

Meanwhile I have been told that all communication of the ethics board, including the names an positions of the applicants, is confidential.

Richard Mann


And the pea under the shells got moved again.


Does anyone know how long a Health Unit may take legally to initiate an investigation once the ‘criteria for assessment’ has been met and publicly declared?


How is this gonna work in Ontario when we have negative power right now…
Demand exceeds production ….
We are importing 1300 MW
We are exporting 781 MW
Negative 531MW

With contracts to 13 states and 60 million people will we be included in the distribution or will the very people who pay for the energy exported be left… in the dark….
Things to think about kids….

Doug Corner

I have started to watch the video. What is the background of this presentation before the panel?

Stan Thayer

Wind energy is now the most costly option for electricity generation in Ontario. We also recognize that wind energy is making a significant contribution to the disruption of the Ontario electricity supply and it can only get worse in future years. The manufacture and installation of the windmills generates huge amounts of greenhouse gasses and the service or repairs requires diesel engines generating a steady production of greenhouse gasses as long as that windmill operates.
Windmills in Ontario have proven to be an unreliable, unstable, unpredictable power source of last resort, especially when we need fossil fuels to excite them.
The amount being consumed by the windmill farms was not taken into consideration when that 6% figure was calculated.
I will make an attempt to inform Brandy Gianetta of the truthful facts that I have witnessed!
Stan Thayer CET


Ontario Hydro

‘2014 Salaries Added to Ontario’s Hydro Costs’

Salaries list:

Also see the 2013 salaries list.

Note: 15 % Hydro One sold. As a result, Hydro One salaries are no longer required to be published on the Sunshine Club List.


I wasn’t quite done watching that video Sommer….. how come I can’t see it now… another link please so I can finish it please….


The video was removed. It was raw footage and most definitely bound to convince anyone who still doesn’t realize that climate data was manipulated in order to create alarm and submission to mitigation expenditures and experiments like industrial wind turbines. The original, unadjusted data has been saved. This information is now moving rapidly in a variety of ways because more and more people are waking up. It’s a real threat to all who were/are benefitting financially from the deception.


Thanks Sommer


I’ve heard that hydro one has an employee investment plan that match a $5 contribution for every $1 an employee invests…. true?????

Leave a comment


email* (not published)