NEWS RELEASE
Federal government grant to wind power project questioned
Wind power forcing electricity bills up and business out of Ontario
Toronto, July 22, 2015
Wind Concerns Ontario (WCO) has written a letter to Tony Clement, MP for Parry Sound-Muskoka, questioning the rationale for a $3-million grant of taxpayer funds to a large wind power generation project near Parry Sound in his riding.
The announcement came less than a week after the Fiat-Chrysler CEO visited Ontario and chided Premier Kathleen Wynne on the province’s lack of competitiveness for manufacturing. Renewable power sources such wind and solar are widely credited with causing Ontario’s electricity costs to soar, while providing an unreliable, intermittent source of power.
Wind Concerns estimates that the Henvey Inlet project will cost Ontario $2.3 billion over the 20-year contract for the project.
Wind power also does not create the number of jobs promised: most are short-term during the construction phase.
“We’re asking for clarification of the government’s policy on wind power,” says WCO president Jane Wilson. “On the one hand, we have countless reports, including two Ontario Auditors General statements, that say we desperately need a cost-benefit analysis for Ontario’s renewables program, and then we have two federal studies that point out potential health impacts from the noise emissions from the large-scale wind turbines, and on the other, we now have more taxpayers’ money going to support another project.
“What’s the government’s policy on wind power?”
Wind Concerns Ontario is a coalition of community groups and individuals concerned about the impact of large-scale wind power development on the natural environment, the economy, and human health.
See the letter to MP Tony Clement here: WCOletterTonyClementJuly20
5 Comments
Sommer
This is excellent Jane!
Thank you again for your diligence and persistence.
Barbara
Businesses make location and/or expansion plans well in advance based on what they know about economic and political projections in any give area.
The decision by one auto company to locate plants in another country was made some 10 or more years ago.
A whole lot of carbon credits can be bought/ paid for by paying much lower wages.
Ontario faces a dim future as far as manufacturing goes and electricity prices are not the only factors.
Barbara
Forbes, Oct.27, 2014
“From 2001-2013, California’s industrial electricity prices were 65% above the U.S. average, and around 700,000 manufacturing jobs were lost-a fleeing of industry is a main reason why California requires less electricity.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/judeclemente/2014/10/27/hey-epa-the-california-model-doesnt-work-and-well-need-more-electricity/
Parker Gallant
As of June 2015 only 7 states in the US have higher unemployment rates than California. Those 700,000 lost manufacturing jobs would have made a big difference!
http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm
Barbara
And each lost manufacturing job would have supported about 2-3 other non-manufacturing jobs.