Wynne government “ignoring its own laws” on environment, wildlife

The Wellington Times, September 18, 2015
What to expect next
It’s hard to gauge what the fallout will be from the Environmental Review Tribunal, which was put on hold over a week ago while managers and technical support at the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) dig through their paperwork to find any documents related to the proposed wind project at Ostrander Point.
As Prince Edward Hastings MPP Todd Smith points out, until larger players in provincial and national media understand what’s happening, that fallout could be minimal.
Speaking from Toronto, Smith said he will do his best to help them understand the implication of what happened in Demorestville two Fridays ago.
“I don’t think that the media here in the GTA… really understand what the government is doing by imposing these projects on unwilling hosts,” says Smith. “I’m hoping that I can really elevate that here so the media in Toronto starts to tell the story of these small communities outside the GTA and the impact it’s having on them. That’s going to be my focus going forward.”
The years-long, drawn out tug-of-war between Gilead Power Company and the residents of Prince Edward County came to a head when, at the second Tribunal, it came to light that an expert—a researcher for the Ministry of Natural Resources— had recommended against a permit to kill, harm and harass an endangered species.
His recommendation was not in the evidence supplied to the lawyers who argued that the project would cause serious and irreversible harm to that species, the Blanding’s turtle.
It was an omission that called into question the entire renewable energy process. Ontarians rely the integrity and thoroughness of such reviews. Departments like the MNRF are expected to make unbiased decisions based on this expert advice, not politicized decisions to a political end.
“The government is ignoring its own laws,” says Smith. “They’re ignoring their own scientific experts under the premise that they’re doing something good for the environment when clearly all of the evidence is showing they’re probably doing more harm to the environment than any good that can be achieved by forcing these projects on unwilling host communities.”
County mayor Robert Quaiff, whose planned meeting with the Minister of Environment and Climate Change was cancelled this week after the hiatus was called on the Tribunal, says although we don’t know the outcome, the new information gives hope.
Jolanta Kowalski, a media relations officer for the MNRF, argues that the decision-making process is more nuanced, and relies on a variety of experts to come up with an overall picture of what should be done.
Kowalski declined to discuss the specific decision in question, because the researcher is currently in cross-examination at the suspended Tribunal. She did explain the MNRF’s process in general terms, though.
“MNRF staff review and evaluate applications for permits made under the ESA [Endangered Species Act]. Evaluation and development of a permit can take months, and a team would be involved that could include biologists, ecologists, botanists, policy staff, planners, lands experts among others. The team approach works well and a variety of views are taken in to account,” Kowalski explains. “In the end, a recommendation is made based on the requirements of the ESA.”
Kowalski says the information is collated to determine the overall benefit, based on a clause in the act. They determine if, given imposed requirements, the project can achieve an overall benefit to the species, whether reasonable alternatives have been considered and whether steps have been taken minimize adverse effects.
It seems in this case, much of that evidence came from studies of a different species of turtle with different nesting patterns. In the end, the MNRF’s expert on the Blanding’s turtle conceded that in studying the application to grant a permit to kill, harm or harass that species, he told his superiors it should not be granted.
Smith is pursuing answers from the ministers involved, but is not confident they’ll be easy to come by from what he calls “a stubborn government that won’t change its course.”
“This week, we’ve had an agreement signed between Ontario and Quebec to bring green, renewable energy—hydroelectric power—from Quebec into Ontario.” says Smith.
“So If we have an agreement to get green, renewable— affordable—energy into Ontario, why are we continuing down this road of building these solar and wind energy projects at a much higher price with a bigger impact on the communities, in communities that don’t want them. It just doesn’t make any sense.”

What's your reaction?


  • Barbara
    Posted September 19, 2015 12:58 pm 0Likes

    How many other places expect to get hydro-power from Quebec? New York, Vermont and New Hampshire along with Ontario.

    • Barbara
      Posted September 19, 2015 10:09 pm 0Likes

      Electric Co-op Today/ECT, March 9, 2015
      “ISO New England says the reliability of the region’s electrical grid could be threatened by a lack of natural gas pipeline capacity.”
      Page has link to the ISO Report.
      Most of the natural gas in New England is used to heat homes and businesses. What’s left can be used to produce power. During winter cold snaps not much gas is left to produce power and sometimes no gas for power.
      Renewables require backup gas powered generation.

    • Barbara
      Posted September 20, 2015 10:40 am 0Likes

      The Brattle Group, Cambridge, MA, July 13, 2015
      ‘Study by Brattle Economists Quantifies the Impacts of Utility-scale Solar PV’
      Key findings:
      The generation cost of energy from 300 MW of utility-scale PV is about 1/2 the cost per kWh from an equivalent 300 MW of 5 kW residential-scale solar systems.
      Avoids about 50% more carbon emissions than an equivalent amount of residential-scale PV solar.
      The Brattle Group has also done consulting work on energy issues for the Ontario government. Google for Ontario consulting work if anyone is interested.

  • Gord Schneider
    Posted September 19, 2015 3:09 pm 0Likes

    Typical for this government. I’m no longer surprised by anything it does or does not do. I sincerely believe that the Ontario government under Kathleen Wynne is out of control and will attempt to force its will on the people of Ontario when in fact the people don’t want it and the government has no mandate to do so.
    Surely there must be some legal recourse to this situation. To the best of my knowledge the only governments that can impose their wills without fear of retribution are communist and dictator governments in societies where deomcracy doesn’t exist.

  • R Budd
    Posted September 20, 2015 12:27 pm 0Likes

    re….This week, we’ve had an agreement signed between Ontario and Quebec to bring green, renewable energy—hydroelectric power—from Quebec into Ontario.” says Smith.
    Since when is daming a major watershed and a massive transmission corridor GREEN? The wind pushers would love to see this actually. Its their dream to flow wind and hydro back and forth on a transcontinental super grid.
    When we had a Long Term Energy Plan devised by actual engineers, not high school drop outs, it called for two new reactors at Darlington which would have produced as much usable electricty as the whole GEA deployment.
    With the low interest rates the cost would have been a fraction of the ultimate cost from the GEA, or the exported assets for imported QC hydro for that matter. There would have been no loss of productive land or negative impact on communities and wildlife habitat. The GTA could have then dealt with On’s biggest emissions problem by electrifying its transportaion system and it would actually be a public asset for the future. Instead we get the corporate owned millstone being carved out for Ontario by the Liberals and a fire sale of public assets.

    • Barbara
      Posted September 20, 2015 12:49 pm 0Likes

      And any kinds of financial derivatives like carbon trading, yieldcos , hedge funds that those on Bay Street and Wall Street can dream up to make money trading “paper” from this scheme.

    • Barbara
      Posted September 20, 2015 2:40 pm 0Likes

      USA TODAY, June 13, 2013
      ‘In U.S. building industry, is it too easy to be green?’
      ” Across the United States, the Green Building Council has helped thousands of developers win tax breaks and grants, charge higher rents, exceed local building restrictions, and get expedited permitting by certifying them as ‘green’ under a system that often rewards, minor low-cost steps that have little or no proven environmental benefit a USA TODAY analysis has found.”

Add Comment

© Copyright 2022 | WCO | Wind Concerns Ontario

to top