FAIL: Ontario’s wind turbine noise monitoring process

New information reveals audits of Ontario wind power projects still not complete after years in review

September 30, 2019
When the Ontario government under premier Dalton McGuinty introduced the Green Energy and Green Economy Act in 2009, the premier promised that regulations for setbacks between the industrial-scale wind turbines and Ontario residents’ homes would be based on science, for health and safety.
“If you have concerns [about health and safety],” he said, “ we must find a way to address those.”[1]
So, promises of protection were made to the people of rural Ontario, who were without recourse as their quiet communities were transformed into power generation facilities.
But there was little or no protection.
Information provided to Wind Concerns Ontario by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shows that lengthy periods, sometimes years, elapsed between the submission, review and acceptance of technical reports required to confirm that turbines were safe. The majority are still either not complete or in review.
Meanwhile, citizen complaints of excessive noise, many with reports of adverse health effects linked to sleep disturbance, continue. Thousands of complaints have been registered with the government, most without resolution.[2]
Regulations exist but checking for compliance involves comparing real noise measurements via “audits” (done by the wind power operators themselves, using acoustics contractors) against their own “modelled” or predicted noise levels.[3]
According to the information provided by Eugene Macchione, Acting Director Client Services and Permissions Branch of the environment ministry in an email dated August 9 this year, of the 49 wind power projects listed in response to our request under Freedom of Information legislation:

  • 16 are determined to be incomplete
  • 15 are still in review
  • 12 have demonstrated compliance with regulations
  • 3 are not yet due
  • 2 are non-compliant and in Noise Abatement plans, and
  • 1 was never submitted.

These figures mean that, according to the environment ministry’s list, Conservation and Parks, almost 70 percent of the audits required to assure health and safety are either not complete as submitted, are in review, not compliant, or not submitted at all.
The list is not complete and is missing 11 post-Green Energy Act projects; more projects, at least 19, are also not listed.
 
WIND POWER PROJECT AUDIT STATUS AS OF JULY 30, 2019, FROM MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, CONSERVATION AND PARKS

Not only are the required audit reports not completed, the time elapsed between submission of the audits and conclusion of the government review is astonishing. The Conestogo wind power project began commercial operation on December 20, 2012, and is listed as still being “in review” as of July 30 for 2,058 days — that’s over five and a half years. According to noise report data provided to Wind Concerns Ontario via FOI, Conestogo has been the subject of dozens of noise complaints from nearby residents.
East Durham Wind Energy Centre began commercial operation in 2015, but after 1,087 days, it is now listed as incomplete; the project racked up almost 300 formal noise complaints in just a year and a half.
The Summerhaven power project has been operating since August 2013, and remains “in review” after more than 2,000 days, or 5.4 years.
The list provided by the ministry is not only incomplete, however, it is inaccurate: the K2 Wind power project, which is number three in Ontario for noise complaints as of 2016 (it started operation in 2015) is listed as “incomplete” when in fact, the project was found to be out of compliance with more than 80 of its 140 turbines not meeting the regulations. The project is currently under a Director’s Order to implement a noise abatement plan.[4]
Bluewater is one project that was determined to be “in compliance” (despite many noise complaints against it), but its audit report was in review for four years.
The single wind turbine owned by union Unifor is not named on the government list but was the subject of over 300 complaints by the end of 2016, with many more reported in the media. Meeting recently with environment minister Jeff Yurek, residents of Port Elgin told him that audits were never done for the turbine, in spite of hundreds of complaints, many with reports of adverse health effects. [5]
 
DAYS IN REVIEW: WIND TURBINE PROJECTS CURRENTLY DEEMED “INCOMPLETE” AS OF JULY 30, 2019

Source: Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, August 9, 2019
The new government seems to be actively demanding audits be done, and several Ontario projects are now under order to reduce noise, but a lot of people have been waiting a long time for these reviews, says Wind Concerns Ontario president Jane Wilson.
In April 2017, MPP Lisa Thompson asked a question in the Ontario Legislature regarding resolution of complaints about wind turbine noise emissions experienced by two families in her riding of Huron-Bruce. Then Minister of the Environment and Climate Change in the Wynne government Glen Murray assured members of the Legislature that:

The … law works. There are standards. When people call, I’m very proud of the officials. They respond quickly and they enforce the law. The law is being enforced here. If wind turbines or any other type of technology exceeds sound levels, we enforce the law. … No one should have to suffer noise or noise pollution from any source, and certainly not wind turbines in their community.[6]

“People were promised—and they are still being told by environment staff, every day—that the rules are there to protect them,” Wilson says. “But here’s the truth: the rules may be there but they’re not adequate, and they haven’t been enforced. The previous government appears to have been very protective of the wind power business.”
The Ministry has multiple options to force wind power operators to comply with regulations, including shutdown. (See Sections E1 and E3 of the Compliance Protocol). The project operators are required to post the submitted audits publicly, but there is a serious inconsistency in this. The Compliance Protocol on the ministry website appears to have been edited and is now contradictory.[7] As of September 24, 2019, the protocol (with the apparent cut-and-paste errors) reads:

The Ministry will also require that all Acoustic Audit reportsSummary [sic] documents are also acceptable but upon request, the complete audit should be made available. be posted [sic] on the project website within 10 business days of the Acoustic Audit being submitted to the Director and District Manager. The Ministry expects the owner/operator to ensure that the Acoustic Audit reports, and any updates, remain available to the public on the project website for the life of the project.

The larger issue is the fact the Compliance Protocol is flawed: it is based on audible noise and does not take into account the full range of noise emissions from wind turbines. Low-frequency inaudible emissions are implicated in many adverse health effects, but were not included in the regulations which were themselves formulated with guidance from the wind power lobby.
“While the current government seems to be committed to enforcing the noise regulations for wind power generators, there is a long way to go before the people of rural Ontario are protected,” says Wilson.
© WIND CONCERNS ONTARIO
contact@windconcernsontario.ca
Read the MECP document here: I and E Audits July 30 2019 – (Aug 9 2019) (1)
NOTE: data on noise reports filed with the Government of Ontario are only available at present for 2006–2016; requests have been made for 2017 and 2018 data, but have not been fulfilled. WCO recently applied for a second appeal with the Information and Privacy Commissioner’s Office for refusal to reply to the 2017 data request.
[1] Toronto Star, February 11, 2009. “McGuinty vows to stop wind farm NIMBYs.” Available at: https://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/2009/02/11/mcguinty_vows_to_stop_windfarm_nimbys.html
[2] Wind Concerns Ontario. Response to Wind Turbine Noise Complaints, 2nd report 2015-2016, February 2018.
[3] According to the Compliance Protocol for Wind Turbine Noise two kinds of audits are required as part of their Renewable Energy Approval, and to comply with Ontario regulations. They are: E-Audits to verify the validity of the sound power levels provided by manufacturers, and used in acoustic models to determine the noise impact of a wind facility at receptor locations; and I-Audits to verify the validity of predicted sound pressure levels in Acoustic Assessment Reports, and verify compliance with applicable sound level limits at receptor locations.
 
[4] Scott Miller, CTV News London, May 27, 2019. Wind farm ordered to reduce noise. Available at: https://london.ctvnews.ca/wind-farm-ordered-to-reduce-noise-1.4438989
[5] Shoreline Beacon, September 24, 2019. Environment minister hears about Port Elgin wind turbine suffering. Available at: https://www.shorelinebeacon.com/news/local-news/environment-minister-hears-about-port-elgin-wind-turbine-suffering
[6]Hansard, Ontario Legislature, Oral Questions, Session:  41:2   Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017
[7] Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, Compliance Protocol, Section E5.1 Complete Submissions. Available at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/compliance-protocol-wind-turbine-noise

What's your reaction?
0Cool0Upset0Love0Lol

9 Comments

  • Mike Jankowski
    Posted September 30, 2019 2:35 pm 0Likes

    This is further evidence that the MoE is failing in its mandate to protect communities.
    We require strong leadership to protect people by stepping up and taking new actions in order to rectify this. I believe a mandate for significant engineering change needs to be undertaken on all existing wind turbines, and that they should be stopped until this can be proven safe. Ignoring infrasound and its characteristics is not a way to prove they are safe for people and animals.

    • Wind Concerns Ontario
      Posted September 30, 2019 5:53 pm 0Likes

      We are seeing the present government taking steps to enforce the regulations but the fundamental is checking back against the predictive modeling. As well, as long as people are filing complaints about noise/vibration and adverse health effects, just following the compliance protocol is obviously not enough. Regulations need to cover the full range of wind turbine noise emissions.

  • Richard Mann
    Posted September 30, 2019 3:05 pm 0Likes

    Exactly. Projects must be stopped until proven safe. It should not be incumbent on citizens to prove their own harm.
    For an update on health harm from infra sound and low frequency noise, please see the following talk by Mariana Alves-Pereira, University of Waterloo, Sept 12, 2019. Also note that infra sound travels much farther than audible sound (due to the long wavelengths of the sound waves). So far wind proponents ignore infra sound. In fact our government is not even measuring it.
    https://livestream.com/itmsstudio/events/8781285

  • Sommer
    Posted September 30, 2019 8:49 pm 0Likes

    The stand taken by New York State’s Public Health Officer, Daniel Stapleton is correct.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWwLAxIaiYY
    Our Public Health Officers in Ontario need to protect their communities from these turbines. They need to go to the government and demand that turbines be turned off until the wind companies can prove they’re safe.

    • Wind Concerns Ontario
      Posted October 1, 2019 9:46 am 0Likes

      They need evidence, which is why the Huron County follow-up on complaints study was so important (phase II of that was to be actual noise measurement), but since it did not get enough participants, it will now have no weight. And now, the municipalities that were watching that, planning to do their own, will not go forward. The government/environment ministry as late as last year at the Nation Rise appeal, insists that the noise complaints are merely “anecdotal” — even those detailed records prepared by and

        signed off

      by Provincial Environmental Officers, who are by law “Public Officers” and whose notes may be used in legal proceedings as evidence. This does not mean people should stop filing complaints though–without them, there is no record.

  • Sommer
    Posted October 1, 2019 10:41 am 0Likes

    Daniel Stapleton is correct. Listen to this video which you posted at WCO!
    He says clearly in the first few minutes the exact opposite of what you keep repeating.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWwLAxIaiYY&feature=youtu.be

    • Wind Concerns Ontario
      Posted October 1, 2019 11:09 am 0Likes

      Sorry, but you were not in the room at the Nation Rise appeal (or on the witness stand) when the MECP lawyer spoke about the Huron Cty study and how it has no significance either in law or for the government. Mr Stapleton, whose efforts we applaud, is in New York, a completely different jurisdiction, and he is also head of the association of public health authorities. His statements are based on what evidence he has, which he feels is adequate to move forward with their position statement.The Huron Cty project is very important, no doubt about it.

  • Stan Thayer
    Posted October 10, 2019 5:27 am 0Likes

    Sheesh, what a thought provoking mess the wind industry has created!
    Part of the subsidies paid to developers from our hydro bills is going back to municipalities to offset the loss in tax revenue from lowered assessments.
    Cool eh!
    The Canadian Wind Association is looking for partners and will probably hookup with the Canadian Solar Association before they go the way of the dinosaurs. Lots of subsidies gone to waste there!
    Anyone who can afford to get off the grid has or will. It’s easy, move out of Ontario. That leaves less people to pay more for the increasing overall costs.
    The IESO has added departments, committees, councils, call them what you want, more cost to the ratepayers to administer, aka- (oversee), the required changes.
    Transformer overloads, appliance burnouts, massive fish kills from ground fault backfeeds, human health problems where ever there are windmills.
    Reports from older fisherman that the offshore windmills have killed or drove the fish away. No one seems to have an explanation, the fish are just gone off the radar.
    Cool eh!
    What really concerns me is Donald Trump complaining about the ugly windmills keeping the tourists away from his golf resort in Scotland. They better check his golf cart for a hacksaw!
    In some places the constant ground vibrations from the huge heavy windmills has caused potable water wells to become contaminated and useless even for washing animals or vehicles.
    Cool eh!
    In the winter, windmills can throw ice chunks up to half a kilometer. If you decide to watch stay back a bit more.
    Oh yeah, sometimes when the wind blows just right they produce electrical power that we don’t need.
    Now that’s cool!
    Thanks for reading,,,’WIND INDUSTRY GONE NUTS”.
    Stan

Add Comment

© Copyright 2022 | WCO | Wind Concerns Ontario

to top